The Facts
Buried in the midst of the thousands of numbers that lay bare the true horror of Portsmouth Football Club, one stands out above all others.
108.79%
This is the percentage of revenue the club spent on wages and overheads in the financial year ended 31 May, 2009.
What it tells you, quite simply, is that Portsmouth were spending so far beyond their means that their financial collapse was inevitable.
What it also confirms is that, for all the talk of police investigations into missing money and conspiracy theories, the true tragedy of Portsmouth is that it was all done legitimately and by the book.
There is no need to spend hours poring over the fine print, looking for evidence that money was going missing. It was being walked out of the front door under everyone's noses.
Even in the nine months to the end of February 2010, when the club was trying to wrestle with the inflated wage bill, salaries and overheads still accounted for 98% of revenue.
And during the 21 months from June 2008 to February 2010, Portsmouth racked up pre-tax losses of £16.7m even though they made a profit during that time of £46m on the sale of players - big names such as Lassana Diarra, Jermain Defoe, Peter Crouch and Sulley Muntari.
Which of course begs the question: Who is to blame?
The Premier League unquestionably deserves to shoulder some of the responsibility for allowing a regulatory culture to develop where one of its member clubs could be so wasteful.
To be fair to the Premier League, it is starting to get its house in order and its new financial reporting rules now require clubs to prove they are being run in a sound manner at the start of each season.
If it has any doubts, it can demand monthly financial reports or withhold payments of TV monies and ban spending on player transfers and contracts. The "rank bad management" which the Premier League's chief executive Richard Scudamore blames for the mess at Fratton Park is unlikely to be given the chance to flourish elsewhere in the future.
And, ultimately, what can any league or governing body do if a club's management is hell bent on destruction?
Many people will blame Peter Storrie, the club's former chief executive, who was paid £1.2m a year plus bonuses to oversee this car crash of a football club.
Storrie has already tried to defend himself in an interview with the Daily Telegraph in which he claimed it was all down to three consecutive owners failing to put money in.
That succession of owners has, of course, played its part. The club's fans will undoubtedly feel that Sacha Gaydamak, in particular, should have done more to prevent the flow of money out of the club once it became clear the credit crunch was taking its toll on his family's fortune.
But having read through the pages and pages of horrific detail - the £120m of debts which include £30m to Gaydamak, £17m to the taxman, £9m to agents and £5m to former players - it is hard to believe that Storrie could not have seen for himself the full scale of the nightmare unfolding.
It is detailed here, in the 15 pages of local businesses and services who make up the list of trade creditors owed a total of £5m.
These are football's real losers. Companies and individuals who now face being paid only 23p in the pound of what they are owed because footballers and football creditors get paid in full first from the proceeds of any sale of the club.
They include:
The St John's Ambulance (for match day medical services) - £2,701
King Edward VI School (for training ground hire) - £41,714
Landscape Printing Systems (for printing equipment) - £949.33
Portsmouth City Council (taxes) - £28,690
The Premier League, using its beefed up fit and proper persons rules, already has grounds to disqualify Storrie from ever running a football club again on the basis that he has taken a club into administration.
It is also a possibility that the Premier League could investigate him for any discrepancies between what he said while he was in charge and what today's documents tell us about what was really happening.
John changed his name to John Portsmouth Football Club Westwood.
Sunday afternoon. The FA Cup semi-final. Portsmouth are upsetting the odds and beating Spurs. The Pompey hordes are in full voice. Invariably the TV director cuts to the clichéd close-up shot of Portsmouth’s most famous fan. You know the one I mean. Mr Portsmouth. The geezer with the tattoos, blue and white stove pipe hat, and long, curly blue locks. He looks like a slightly more demented version of the late Screaming Lord Sutch, leader of the Monster Raving Loony Party.
Mr Portsmouth ticks all the right football-obsessive boxes. He changed his name by deed poll in 1989 to John Anthony Portsmouth Football Club Westwood. His body is a shrine to Pompey with 60 Pompey tattoos and the letters ‘PFC’ engraved on his teeth. And he’s been to every game, home and away, since 1980. As Portsmouth’s off-field problems mount, Westwood has come to symbolise the fanatical devotion of the Fratton Park faithful, the embodiment of ‘Portsmouth Till I Die’.
However, while his lugubrious face is always on our TV screens, far less media attention has been paid to the ongoing battle between Westwood and the football authorities. Last month, Westwood received a letter from the club warning that he could be banned from Fratton Park for persistent standing. Yes, you read that right. His crime is persistent standing. Not throwing missiles or fighting or spitting. Persistent standing. It’s what most of us do every day at bus stops and railway stations. No one usually gets hurt. But in a football stadium it is supposedly a health and safety hazard. Go figure.
The local council’s Safety Advisory Group believes that Westwood is the main reason that hundreds of Portsmouth fans also stand during matches. Apparently, they all take their cue from a bloke in the silly hat. And this isn’t the first time Westwood has fallen foul of the authorities. In October, during the home game against Spurs, he and his friends were ejected from Fratton Park for waving Judas posters at Harry Redknapp. In the 2008/9 season he was moved out of the Fratton End because he was making too much noise with his bugle, bell and drum. As Barry Dewing from the Portsmouth Independent Supporters Association quite rightly said: ‘It sums up what football has become if they are moving people for making too much noise.’ After being moved to different parts of the stadium, Westwood and his mates were eventually allowed to return to their original seats minus the drum, which was banned. When Portsmouth reached the FA Cup Final 2008, Westwood was barred from bringing any musical instruments into Wembley Stadium.
Westwood is a man who divides opinions. Judging by some message board threads, many rival fans think he’s an alcoholic clown who lives with his mother and has never had a girlfiend (it happens to be a myth – he’s actually divorced and has two children). Not all Pompey fans are enamoured by his musical cacophony. Others feel he sullies the club’s reputation. ‘This is a man who turns up completely drunk to football matches and clashes with stewards and police’, wrote one supporter on the Fratton Faithful website after Westwood was ejected from Gillingham’s Priestfield stadium in 2002. By his own admission, Westwood has been ejected from stadiums up and down the land. He was banned from Southampton’s St Mary’s stadium for urinating on seats in the away end.
Fancy dress isn’t really my cup of tea but, after watching Man of the Match, an endearing documentary about Westwood made by students from the University of Chichester, I warmed to the bloke (1). As the film shows, he is just an ordinary, passionate fan who likes to get drunk, let off some steam, and cheer on his football team on a Saturday afternoon. As he said in an interview last year: ‘Football is a release. You work hard all week. Yes sir, no sir, three bags full sir, so you go to football to enjoy yourself.’ In other words, hat and wig apart, he’s not much different to the rest of us. ‘During the week I have got to be sensible and then on Saturdays you enter the madness of football. It’s like having two different lives.’ When he’s not wearing his hat and ringing his bell, Westwood runs an antiquarian bookshop in the village of Petersfield. ‘People look at me and think I must be some madman off a building site, but books are my life’, he said.
The killjoys who run football seem to have lost sight of the fact that a football stadium is a carnivalesque social arena where the normal social conventions are temporarily inverted. The way we behave on the terraces – singing, swearing, hurling dog’s abuse – is the opposite of how we behave when we’re at work. If, as is increasingly the case at football, you criminalise the drunken, irreverent, unruly conduct of fans, then you inevitably damage the matchday experience.
And that’s why a harmless eccentric like Westwood faces being banned from Fratton Park. Like many football fans, Westwood finds himself at odds with petty rules and regulations that are squeezing the life and atmosphere out of football. ‘Nowadays football’s becoming a bit PC’, Westwood says in the documentary. ‘They don’t like people who stick out and make too much noise, show a bit of passion.’ Too right. He might be a bit of a clown but, when it comes to a showdown with the football authorities, I’ll side with the clowns every time.


The Living Legend!

Fratton Park home of The Portsmouth Football Club
The Nine Point Deduction
This decision alone ended Portsmouth's participation in The Premier League.
PORTSMOUTH FC have been officially docked nine points by the Premier League.
League bosses met this morning and have now confirmed that the Fratton Park club have been immediately deducted the points as a penalty for going into administration.
That leaves the club - which was already bottom of the Premier League beforehand - with just 10 points.
That means the club is a colossal 17 points off safety, having won just five league games all season.
As a result, they are all but relegated to the Championship.
Your Vote
Is Pompey's punishment right?
Yes - a nine point deduction is right:
15%
No - should have been deducted more:
15%
No - they should have been wound up:
49%
No - it's unfair on Pompey fans and players:
6%
No - makes no difference as they were already going down:
15%
They have been docked nine points rather than the 10 Saints were docked with as there are less games in a Premier League season than there are in the Football League.
The Premier League's full statement reads: "Following the High Court's decision that Portsmouth FC's administration is valid the Premier League Board convened today to apply the League's rules and policies in relation to a member club suffering an event of insolvency.
"As a result Portsmouth FC has been deducted nine points with immediate effect.
"As part of this process the Board met with the Administrator to agree how we will work together for the remainder of the season to ensure that the club is able fulfil its commitments."
The Portsmouth Football Club will no doubt spend considerable time in the lower Championship Division, it may never climb back into The Premier League.
But..
One more game remains..
The 2010 FA Cup Final @ Wembley
Portsmouth V Chelsea

15th May 3pm
FA CUP
Score.
Portsmouth 0
Chelsea 1